Cost-Volume-Profit
Relationships
Learning Objectives
1. Explain how changes in activity
affect contribution margin and net operating income.
2. Prepare and interpret a
cost-volume-profit (CVP) graph.
3. Use the contribution margin ratio
(CM ratio) to compute changes in contribution margin and net operating income
resulting from changes in sales volume.
4. Show the effects on contribution
margin of changes in variable costs, fixed costs, selling price, and volume.
5. Compute the break-even point in
unit sales and sales dollars.
6. Determine the level of sales needed
to achieve a desired target profit.
7. Compute the margin of safety and
explain its significance.
8. Compute the degree of operating
leverage at a particular level of sales, and explain how the degree of
operating leverage can be used to predict changes in net operating income.
9. Compute the break-even point for
a multiple product company and explain the effects of shifts in the sales mix
on contribution margin and the break-even point.
Overview
A. The Basics of
Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) Analysis.
Cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis is a key step in many decisions. CVP analysis
involves specifying a model of the relations among the prices of products, the
volume or level of activity, unit variable costs, total fixed costs, and the
sales mix. This model is used to predict the impact on profits of changes in
those parameters.
1. Contribution Margin. Contribution margin is the amount remaining from sales
revenue after variable expenses have been deducted. It contributes towards
covering fixed costs and then towards profit.
2. Unit Contribution Margin. The unit contribution margin can be used to predict changes
in total contribution margin as a result of changes in the unit sales of a
product. To do this, the unit contribution margin is simply multiplied by the
change in unit sales. Assuming no change in fixed costs, the change in total
contribution margin falls directly to the bottom line as a change in profits.
3. Contribution Margin Ratio. The contribution margin (CM) ratio is the ratio of the
contribution margin to total sales. It shows how the contribution margin is
affected by a given dollar change in total sales. The contribution margin ratio
is often easier to work with than the unit contribution margin, particularly
when a company has many products. This is because the contribution margin ratio
is denominated in sales dollars, which is a convenient way to express activity
in multi-product firms.
B. Some Applications of
CVP Concepts. CVP analysis is typically used to
estimate the impact on profits of changes in selling price, variable cost per
unit, sales volume, and total fixed costs. CVP analysis can be used to estimate
the effect on profit of a change in any one (or any combination) of these
parameters. A variety of examples of applications of CVP are provided in the
text.
C. CVP Relationships in
Graphic Form. CVP graphs can be used to gain
insight into the behavior of expenses and profits. The basic CVP graph is drawn
with dollars on the vertical axis and unit sales on the horizontal axis. Total
fixed expense is drawn first and then variable expense is added to the fixed
expense to draw the total expense line. Finally, the total revenue line is
drawn. The total profit (or loss) is the vertical difference between the total
revenue and total expense lines. The break-even occurs at the point where the
total revenue and total expenses lines cross.
D. Break-Even Analysis
and Target Profit Analysis. Target
profit analysis is concerned with estimating the level of sales required to
attain a specified target profit. Break-even analysis is a special case of
target profit analysis in which the target profit is zero.
1. Basic CVP equations. Both the equation and contribution (formula) methods of
break-even and target profit analysis are based on the contribution approach to
the income statement. The format of this statement can be expressed in equation
form as:
Profits = Sales - Variable expenses
- Fixed expenses
In CVP analysis this equation is
commonly rearranged and expressed as:
Sales = Variable expenses + Fixed
expenses + Profits
a. The above equation can be
expressed in terms of unit sales as follows:
Price
x Unit sales = Unit variable cost x Unit sales + Fixed expenses + Profits
Unit
contribution margin x Unit sales = Fixed expenses + Profits
Unit sales = (Fixed Expenses + Profits)/ Unit Contribution
Margin
b. The basic equation can also be
expressed in terms of sales dollars using the variable expense ratio:
Sales
= Variable expense ratio x Sales + Fixed expenses + Profits
(1
- Variable expense ratio) x Sales = Fixed expenses + Profits
Contribution
margin ratio* x Sales = Fixed expenses + Profits
Sales = (Fixed Expenses + Profits)/ Contribution Margin
Ratio
*
1 - Variable expense ratio = 1 – (Variable Expenses / Sales)
Contribution Margin
Ratio = (Sales - Variable Expenses) / Sales
=
Contributionmargin/Sales
2. Break-even point using the
equation method. The break-even point is the level
of sales at which profit is zero. It can also be defined as the point where
total sales equals total expenses or as the point where total contribution
margin equals total fixed expenses. Break-even analysis can be approached
either by the equation method or by the contribution margin method. The two
methods are logically equivalent.
a. The Equation Method—Solving
for the Break-Even Unit Sales. This method involves following the steps in
section (1a) above. Substitute the selling price, unit variable cost and fixed
expense in the first equation and set profits equal to zero. Then solve for the
unit sales.
b. The Equation Method—Solving
for the Break-Even Sales in Dollars. This method involves following the
steps in section (1b) above. Substitute the variable expense ratio and fixed
expenses in the first equation and set profits equal to zero. Then solve for
the sales.
3. Break-even point using the
contribution method. This is a short-cut method that
jumps directly to the solution, bypassing the intermediate algebraic steps.
a. The Contribution
Method—Solving for the Break-Even Unit Sales. This method involves using
the final formula for unit sales in section (1a) above. Set profits equal to
zero in the formula.
Break-even unit sales =Fixed
Expenses / Unit Contribution Margin
b. The Contribution
Method—Solving for the Break-Even Sales in Dollars. This method involves
using the final formula for sales in section (1b) above. Set profits equal to
zero in the formula.
Break-even sales = Fixed Expenses /
Contribution Margin Ratio
4. Target profit analysis. Either the equation method or the contribution margin
method can be used to find the number of units that must be sold to attain a
target profit. In the case of the contribution margin method, the formulas are:
Unit sales to attain target profits
= (Fixed Expenses + Target Profits)/ Unit Contribution Margin
Dollar sales to attain target
profits = (Fixed Expenses + Target Profits)/ Contribution Margin Ratio
Note that these formulas are the
same as the break-even formulas if the target profit is zero.
E. Margin of Safety. The margin of safety is the excess of budgeted (or actual)
sales over the break-even volume of sales. It is the amount by which sales can
drop before losses begin to be incurred. The margin of safety can be computed
in terms of dollars:
Margin
of safety in dollars = Total sales – Break-even sales
or
in percentage form:
Margin
of safety percentage = Margin of safety in dollars / Total sales
F. Cost Structure. Cost structure refers to the relative proportion of fixed
and variable costs in an organization. Understanding a company’s cost structure
is important for decision-making as well as for analysis of performance.
G. Operating Leverage. Operating leverage is a measure of how sensitive net
operating income is to a given percentage change in sales.
1.Degree of operating leverage. The degree of operating leverage at a given level of sales
is computed as follows:
Degree of operating leverage = Contribution Margin / Net Operating Income
2.The math underlying the degree of
operating leverage. The degree of operating leverage
can be used to estimate how a given percentage change in sales volume will
affect net income at a given level of sales, assuming there is no change in
fixed expenses. To verify this, consider the following:
Degree of operating leverage x Percentage change in Sales = (Contribution Margin / Net Operating Income) x [(New Sales –Sales)/
Sales]
= (Contribution Margin /
Sales) x [(New Sales –Sales)/Net Operating Income]
= CM Ratio x [(New Sales –Sales)/Net Operating Income]
= [CM Ratio x (New Sales –Sales)]/Net Operating Income
= (New Contribution Margin - Contribution
Margin)/ Net Operating Income
=Change in Net Operating Income /Net Operating Income
= Percentage change in net operating
income
Thus, providing that fixed expenses
are not affected and the other assumptions of CVP analysis are valid, the
degree of operating leverage provides a quick way to predict the percentage
effect on profits of a given percentage increase in sales. The higher the
degree of operating leverage, the larger the increase in net operating income.
3.Degree of operating leverage is
not constant. The degree of operating leverage is
not constant as the level of sales changes. For example, at the break-even
point the degree of operating leverage is infinite since the denominator of the
ratio is zero. Therefore, the degree of operating leverage should be used with
some caution and should be recomputed for each level of starting sales.
4. Operating leverage and cost
structure. Richard Lord, “Interpreting and
Measuring Operating Leverage,” Issues in Accounting Education, Fall
1995, pp. 31xx-229, points out that the relation between operating leverage and
the cost structure of the company is contingent. It is difficult, for example,
to infer the relative proportions of fixed and variable costs in the cost
structures of any two companies just by comparing their operating leverages. We
can, however, say that if two single-product companies have the same profit,
the same selling price, the same unit sales, and the same total expenses, then
the company with the higher operating leverage will have a higher proportion of
fixed costs in its cost structure. If they do not have the same profit, the
same unit sales, the same selling price, and the same total expenses, we cannot
safely make this inference about their cost structure. All of the statements in
the text about operating leverage and cost structure assume that the companies
being compared are identical except for the proportions of fixed and variable
costs in their cost structures.
H. Structuring Sales
Commissions. Students may have a tendency to
overlook the importance of this section due to its brevity. You may want to
discuss with your students how salespeople are ordinarily compensated (salary
plus commissions based on sales) and how this can lead to dysfunctional
behavior. For example, would a company make more money if its salespeople
steered customers toward Model A or Model B as described below?
|
Model A
|
Model B
|
Price
|
$100
|
$150
|
Variable Cost
|
75
|
130
|
Unit CM
|
25
|
20
|
Which model will salespeople push
hardest if they are paid a commission of 10% of sales revenue?
I. Sales Mix. Sales mix is the relative proportions in which a company’s
products are sold. Most companies have a number of products with differing
contribution margins. Thus, changes in the sales mix can cause variations in a
company’s profits. As a result, the break-even point in a multi-product company
is dependent on the sales mix.
1. Constant sales mix assumption. In CVP analysis, it is usually assumed that the sales mix
will not change. Under this assumption, the break-even level of sales dollars
can be computed using the overall contribution margin (CM) ratio. In essence,
it is assumed that the company has only one product that consists of a basket
of its various products in a specified proportion. The contribution margin
ratio of this basket can be easily computed by dividing the total contribution
margin of all products by total sales.
Overall
CM ratio = Total Contribution Margin / Total sales
2. Use of the overall CM ratio. The overall
contribution margin ratio can be used in CVP analysis exactly like the
contribution margin ratio for a single product company. For a multi-product
company the formulas for break-even sales dollars and the sales required to
attain a target profit are:
Break-even
sales = Fixed Expenses/ Overall CM
Ratio
Sales to achieve target profits = = (Fixed
Expenses + Target Profits)/ Overall CM Ratio
Note that these formulas are really
the same as for the single product case. The constant sales mix assumption
allows us to use the same simple formulas.
3. Changes in sales mix. If the proportions in which products are sold change, then
the overall contribution margin ratio will change. Since the sales mix is not
in reality constant, the results of CVP analysis should be viewed with more
caution in multi-product companies than in single product companies.
J. Assumptions in CVP
Analysis. Simple CVP analysis relies on
simplifying assumptions. However, if a manager knows that one of the
assumptions is violated, the CVP analysis can often be easily modified to make
it more realistic.
1. Selling price is constant. The assumption is that the selling price of a product will
not change as the unit volume changes. This is not wholly realistic since unit
sales and the selling price are usually inversely related. In order to increase
volume it is often necessary to drop the price. However, CVP analysis can
easily accommodate more realistic assumptions. A number of examples and
problems in the text show how to use CVP analysis to investigate situations in
which prices are changed.
2. Costs are linear and can be
accurately divided into variable and fixed elements. It is assumed that the variable element is constant per
unit and the fixed element is constant in total. This implies that operating
conditions are stable. It also implies that the fixed costs are really fixed.
When volume changes dramatically, this assumption becomes tenuous.
Nevertheless, if the effects of a decision on fixed costs can be estimated,
this can be explicitly taken into account in CVP analysis. A number of examples
and problems in the text show how to use CVP analysis when fixed costs are
affected.
3. The sales mix is constant in
multi-product companies. This
assumption is invoked so as to use the simple break-even and target profit
formulas in multi-product companies. If unit contribution margins are fairly
uniform across products, violations of this assumption will not be important.
However, if unit contribution margins differ a great deal, then changes in the
sales mix can have a big impact on the overall contribution margin ratio and
hence on the results of CVP analysis. If a manager can predict how the sales
mix will change, then a more refined CVP analysis can be performed in which the
individual contribution margins of products are computed.
4. In manufacturing companies,
inventories do not change. It is
assumed that everything the company produces is sold in the same period.
Violations of this assumption result in discrepancies between financial
accounting net operating income and the profits calculated using the
contribution approach. This topic is covered in detail in the chapter on
variable costing.
No comments:
Post a Comment